Difference between revisions of "Talk:Connecticut"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply to LiamG) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What's the sense of [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Connecticut&curid=8177&diff=568821&oldid=568341 this reversion]? Isn't it better to put the links in reference format? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 12:45, 25 November 2008 (EST) | What's the sense of [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Connecticut&curid=8177&diff=568821&oldid=568341 this reversion]? Isn't it better to put the links in reference format? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 12:45, 25 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:It was already reverted, but you would have been fine to go ahead with the revert. The user seems to revert without rhyme or reason. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 01:09, 26 November 2008 (EST) | :It was already reverted, but you would have been fine to go ahead with the revert. The user seems to revert without rhyme or reason. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 01:09, 26 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey for famous people 5 out of 6 is not bad. - jowns | ||
Revision as of 19:21, May 7, 2009
What's the sense of this reversion? Isn't it better to put the links in reference format? LiamG 12:45, 25 November 2008 (EST)
- It was already reverted, but you would have been fine to go ahead with the revert. The user seems to revert without rhyme or reason. -Foxtrot 01:09, 26 November 2008 (EST)
Hey for famous people 5 out of 6 is not bad. - jowns