Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nicolaus Copernicus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Copernican Revolution: I put in a cite) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: I put in a cite, and you still edited it to a "compromise". The statement is correct. Please quit changing it, unless you can back up the change on the Talk page. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:26, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | :: I put in a cite, and you still edited it to a "compromise". The statement is correct. Please quit changing it, unless you can back up the change on the Talk page. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:26, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == What Copernicus would have wanted? == | ||
| + | have taken "but this would hardly have been espoused by Copernicus" out, as it is uncited so impossible to tell what Copernicus would have wanted. | ||
Revision as of 14:56, May 8, 2009
Copernican Revolution
AmesG, you removed a perfectly good sentence, and inserted a misleading one. Tycho's model had its advantages, but it didn't really solve the inconsistencies of the earlier models. Yes, later models were better, but that's obvious. What was wrong with the sentence before: "Many of the ancient Greek arguments for and against heliocentrism remained unresolved."? RSchlafly 19:31, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- Get a cite and let's investigate it.-AmesGyo! 19:55, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- I put in a cite, and you still edited it to a "compromise". The statement is correct. Please quit changing it, unless you can back up the change on the Talk page. RSchlafly 13:26, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
What Copernicus would have wanted?
have taken "but this would hardly have been espoused by Copernicus" out, as it is uncited so impossible to tell what Copernicus would have wanted.