Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darwinius masillae"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(.) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 02:33, May 21, 2009
Wording
You were correct to state it is not the classic "missing link", I think new "missing link" should be removed because it suggests a part of the human to ape question has been found, when it hasn't. "Claimed possibly to an ancestor of primates, including humans." This needs liberal wording and should be reworded as such "evolutionists claim it is the ancestor of primates, which they believe is the ancestor of humans."--Jpatt 22:33, 20 May 2009 (EDT)