Difference between revisions of "Robert M. Groves"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Robert M. Groves''' is a liberal professor from the University of Michigan and a survey expert who has authored several books on the topic. President Obama has chosen him to direct [[Census 2010]]. | '''Robert M. Groves''' is a liberal professor from the University of Michigan and a survey expert who has authored several books on the topic. President Obama has chosen him to direct [[Census 2010]]. | ||
| − | ==History== | + | ==History and Accomplishments== |
Groves was previously involved with the census bureau from 1990 to 1992, where he was associate director of statistical design. Favoring the use of sampling in the census, Groves direction of the census may be unconstitutional under the [[Actual Enumeration]] requirement of Article I. | Groves was previously involved with the census bureau from 1990 to 1992, where he was associate director of statistical design. Favoring the use of sampling in the census, Groves direction of the census may be unconstitutional under the [[Actual Enumeration]] requirement of Article I. | ||
Groves authored a book in 2001 entitled ''Survey Nonresponse''. | Groves authored a book in 2001 entitled ''Survey Nonresponse''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Attempted Survey Readjustment== | ||
"When he was the bureau's associate director, Groves recommended that the 1990 census be statistically adjusted to make up for an undercount of roughly 5 million people, many of them minorities in dense urban areas who tend to vote for Democrats. " <ref>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97AG7201&show_article=1&catnum=0</ref> Thankfully, this "political tampering" was overruled by Republican Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher. | "When he was the bureau's associate director, Groves recommended that the 1990 census be statistically adjusted to make up for an undercount of roughly 5 million people, many of them minorities in dense urban areas who tend to vote for Democrats. " <ref>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97AG7201&show_article=1&catnum=0</ref> Thankfully, this "political tampering" was overruled by Republican Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Since Groves last served in the census bureau, ''Doc v. United States House of Representatives'', 525 U.S. 316 (1999) ruled that "statistical sampling cannot be used to apportion congressional seats, but can be used for other purposes, such as legislative redistricting and, of course, doling out dollars." <ref>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1889793,00.html</ref> | Since Groves last served in the census bureau, ''Doc v. United States House of Representatives'', 525 U.S. 316 (1999) ruled that "statistical sampling cannot be used to apportion congressional seats, but can be used for other purposes, such as legislative redistricting and, of course, doling out dollars." <ref>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1889793,00.html</ref> | ||
Revision as of 15:34, May 21, 2009
Robert M. Groves is a liberal professor from the University of Michigan and a survey expert who has authored several books on the topic. President Obama has chosen him to direct Census 2010.
History and Accomplishments
Groves was previously involved with the census bureau from 1990 to 1992, where he was associate director of statistical design. Favoring the use of sampling in the census, Groves direction of the census may be unconstitutional under the Actual Enumeration requirement of Article I.
Groves authored a book in 2001 entitled Survey Nonresponse.
Attempted Survey Readjustment
"When he was the bureau's associate director, Groves recommended that the 1990 census be statistically adjusted to make up for an undercount of roughly 5 million people, many of them minorities in dense urban areas who tend to vote for Democrats. " [1] Thankfully, this "political tampering" was overruled by Republican Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher.
Since Groves last served in the census bureau, Doc v. United States House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999) ruled that "statistical sampling cannot be used to apportion congressional seats, but can be used for other purposes, such as legislative redistricting and, of course, doling out dollars." [2]
"In testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, the nominee, Robert M. Groves, said he supported the view of Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, who oversees the Census Bureau and has said there are no plans to use statistical sampling in the 2010 count."[3]
Although Groves states he will not use sampling, it is not inconceivable that he could attempt to use other tricks in 2010. For example, hot-deck imputation is an unregulated technique with power to significantly change results, depending on how it is applied.
Criticism of Groves' Nomination
House Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio):
“Conducting the census is a vital Constitutional obligation. Its findings help determine how hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars are spent, as well as how the American people are represented in Congress. It should be as solid, reliable, and accurate as possible in every respect. That is why I’m concerned about the White House decision to select Robert Groves as director of the Census Bureau. As associate director of statistical design at the Census Bureau in the 1990s, Mr. Groves reportedly advocated a scheme to use computer analysis to manipulate Census data, rather than simply conducting an accurate count of the American people. That plan was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1999, but we will have to watch closely to ensure the 2010 census is conducted without attempting similar statistical sleight of hand.” [4]
"With the nomination of Robert Groves, President Obama has made clear that he intends to employ the political manipulation of census data for partisan gain," North Carolina Congressman Patrick McHenry cautioned. [5]
"This is an incredibly troubling selection that contradicts the administration’s assurances that the census process would not be used to advance an ulterior political agenda," said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the top Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.[6]
Hope Yen says, "Census experts have said it would be difficult at this point to make plans for sampling in the 2010 census for congressional redistricting purposes since it is only a year away. It is more likely that Groves could have an impact on statistical adjustment and other decisions as part of long-term planning for census surveys after 2010." [7]
According to TIME, "Groves and his statistical models could still play a major role shaping the census of the future." [8]
References
- ↑ http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97AG7201&show_article=1&catnum=0
- ↑ http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1889793,00.html
- ↑ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/16/us/politics/16census.html
- ↑ http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2009/04/praise_criticism_for_robert_gr.html
- ↑ http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1889793,00.html
- ↑ http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97AG7201&show_article=1&catnum=0
- ↑ http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97AG7201&show_article=1&catnum=0
- ↑ http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1889793,00.html