Difference between revisions of "Talk:Planet"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: It should be noted that the IAU definition of a planet is currently undergoing close scrutiny and debate. After all, according to the current definition, Neptune shouldn't be a planet eit...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
It should be noted that the IAU definition of a planet is currently undergoing  close scrutiny and debate. After all, according to the current definition, Neptune shouldn't be a planet either. (Pluto's and Neptune's orbits cross over each other. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 14:00, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
+
It should be noted that the IAU definition of a planet is currently undergoing  close scrutiny and debate. After all, according to the current definition, Neptune shouldn't be a planet either. (Pluto's and Neptune's orbits cross over each other.) <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 14:00, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:01, March 26, 2007

It should be noted that the IAU definition of a planet is currently undergoing close scrutiny and debate. After all, according to the current definition, Neptune shouldn't be a planet either. (Pluto's and Neptune's orbits cross over each other.) ColinRtalk 14:00, 26 March 2007 (EDT)