Difference between revisions of "Talk:Heterophony"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(another question)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Are the elaborate [[fugue]] parts in Bach's WTT heterophonic? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:21, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
 
Are the elaborate [[fugue]] parts in Bach's WTT heterophonic? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:21, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:No, they're [[polyphony|polyphonic]]. The difference is, heterophony is based on a single melody with several ornamented versions going on at once, whereas polyphony means several fully distinctive melodies. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 18:33, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:33, May 25, 2009

Are the elaborate fugue parts in Bach's WTT heterophonic? --Ed Poor Talk 18:21, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

No, they're polyphonic. The difference is, heterophony is based on a single melody with several ornamented versions going on at once, whereas polyphony means several fully distinctive melodies. JDWpianist 18:33, 25 May 2009 (EDT)