Difference between revisions of "Talk:Heterophony"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JDWpianist (talk | contribs) (reply to Ed Poor) |
(ducks and runs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Actually that's still polyphony, because different voices are singing different things ''at the same time''. Heterophony is more like a kind of "enhanced unison," where everyone is singing basically the same thing at the same time, but slightly different versions. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 17:05, 27 May 2009 (EDT) | :::Actually that's still polyphony, because different voices are singing different things ''at the same time''. Heterophony is more like a kind of "enhanced unison," where everyone is singing basically the same thing at the same time, but slightly different versions. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 17:05, 27 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Okay - but I thought a heterophony is a closeted gay .... ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:11, 27 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:11, May 27, 2009
Are the elaborate fugue parts in Bach's WTT heterophonic? --Ed Poor Talk 18:21, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
- No, they're polyphonic. The difference is, heterophony is based on a single melody with several ornamented versions going on at once, whereas polyphony means several fully distinctive melodies. JDWpianist 18:33, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
- Actually that's still polyphony, because different voices are singing different things at the same time. Heterophony is more like a kind of "enhanced unison," where everyone is singing basically the same thing at the same time, but slightly different versions. JDWpianist 17:05, 27 May 2009 (EDT)