Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
723 bytes added ,  11:41, May 30, 2009
update
Line 64: Line 64:     
===Bankruptcy scenario===
 
===Bankruptcy scenario===
−
Chrysler entered bankruptcy in April 2009, after losing $16.8 billion in 2008, and is expected to lose another $4.7 billion in 2009.  It hopes to emerge quickly, with the old owners wiped out. The new owners will be Fiat of Italy, the UAW and the U.S. government.  GM has until June 2009 to work out deals to escape bankruptcy.  Ford appears to be solvent.
+
Chrysler entered bankruptcy in April 2009, after losing $16.8 billion in 2008, and is expected to lose another $4.7 billion in 2009.  It hopes to emerge quickly, with the old owners wiped out. The new owners will be Fiat of Italy, the UAW and the U.S. government.   
   −
Bankruptcy in practice in 2009 means continued operation for Chrysler and GM. If it involves shutting down, then bankruptcy of the Big Three would be very expensive to the economy as a whole and the federal government. It would mean loss of 240,000 very high paying jobs at the Big Three, a loss of 980,000 high-paying jobs at the suppliers and local dealers, and 1.7 million jobs throughout the economy.  It would cause a decline in personal income of $151 billion the first year, and $398 billion over three years.  The federal, state and local governments would lose tax revenue and spend on welfare programs a total of $156 billion over three years.<ref> CAR Research Memorandum. "The Impact of the U.S. Economy of a Major Contraction of the Detroit Three Automakers" (Nov 2008) [http://www.cargroup.org/documents/FINALDetroitThreeContractionImpact_3__000.pdf online edition]</ref>
+
GM will enter bankruptcy in June 2009. After what is expected to be a short stay, bondholders and the US Treasury will lose most of their investments.  The new company will be 70% owned by the US government (along with the government of Canada), with the UAW holding about 10% ownership.  GM is selling its European operations to a consortium from Canada and Russia, with funding from the German government.
 +
 
 +
[[File:Gm-europe.jpg|thumb|290px]]
 +
Bankruptcy permits Chrysler and GM to shed over one fourth of the dealerships, and walk away from the money they owe the dealers. Once a dealer loses its status, it can sell other brands, or used cars, or go bankrupt.  (The ex-dealers will no longer be able to handle repair work under warranty, an important part of their business.)
 +
Ford appears to be solvent.
 +
 
 +
Bankruptcy in practice in 2009 means continued operation for Chrysler and GM. If it involves totally shutting down, then bankruptcy of the Big Three would be very expensive to the economy as a whole and the federal government. It would mean loss of 240,000 very high paying jobs at the Big Three, a loss of 980,000 high-paying jobs at the suppliers and local dealers, and 1.7 million jobs throughout the economy.  It would cause a decline in personal income of $151 billion the first year, and $398 billion over three years.  The federal, state and local governments would lose tax revenue and spend on welfare programs a total of $156 billion over three years.<ref> CAR Research Memorandum. "The Impact of the U.S. Economy of a Major Contraction of the Detroit Three Automakers" (Nov 2008) [http://www.cargroup.org/documents/FINALDetroitThreeContractionImpact_3__000.pdf online edition]</ref>
    
A bankruptcy of the Big Three would not quickly benefit foreign makers.  The transplants would be severely hurt by the closing of parts companies like American Axle, Delco and Visteon they share with the Big Three, and their output would fall. There would be far fewer new cars for sale for years, and prices would soar. Eventually imports would come from abroad, but they would be much more expensive than current autos.  It takes years to build new plants, and in the current financial crisis there is no funding available for risky multi-billion dollar manufacturing ventures.<ref> Louis Uchitelle, "If Detroit Falls, Foreign Makers Could Be Buffer," [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/business/economy/17impact.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin ''New York Times,'' Nov. 16. 2008] </ref>
 
A bankruptcy of the Big Three would not quickly benefit foreign makers.  The transplants would be severely hurt by the closing of parts companies like American Axle, Delco and Visteon they share with the Big Three, and their output would fall. There would be far fewer new cars for sale for years, and prices would soar. Eventually imports would come from abroad, but they would be much more expensive than current autos.  It takes years to build new plants, and in the current financial crisis there is no funding available for risky multi-billion dollar manufacturing ventures.<ref> Louis Uchitelle, "If Detroit Falls, Foreign Makers Could Be Buffer," [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/business/economy/17impact.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin ''New York Times,'' Nov. 16. 2008] </ref>
    
==Fuel  efficiency==
 
==Fuel  efficiency==
−
The U.S. Congress has set a complicated series of fuel efficiency standards that the Big Three complain they have  a difficult time meeting. California, with over 10% of the market, has its own higher standards. In May 2009 the Obama Administration announced new goals that would set the 2016 target of 39 miles per gallon for cars, compoared to 27.5 in 2008. For light trucks the 2016 target will be 30 mpg, compared to 22.5 in 2008. The rewquired technology will cost about $1300 a car, but drivers will that will be offset by fuel savings of perhaps $2800 over the life of the car, depending on the price of gasoline.  The Big Three claim they can meet the new standards. The Ford Fusion hybrid launched in 2009 gets over 40 mpg, and Ford had started producing the EcoBoost engine, which will raise fuel economy by 15% and lower greenhouse gas emissions by 15%. It expects to sell 750,000 cars a year in the US with the new engine. BMW plans to meet the standard by exporting more diesel cars and trucks to the U.S.
+
The U.S. Congress has set a complicated series of fuel efficiency standards that the Big Three complain they have  a difficult time meeting. California, with over 10% of the market, has its own higher standards. In May 2009 the Obama Administration announced new goals that would set the 2016 target of 39 miles per gallon for cars, compared to 27.5 in 2008. For light trucks the 2016 target will be 30 mpg, compared to 22.5 in 2008. The required technology will cost about $1300 a car, but drivers will that will be offset by fuel savings of perhaps $2800 over the life of the car, depending on the price of gasoline.  The Big Three claim they can meet the new standards. The Ford Fusion hybrid launched in 2009 gets over 40 mpg, and Ford had started producing the EcoBoost engine, which will raise fuel economy by 15% and lower greenhouse gas emissions by 15%. It expects to sell 750,000 cars a year in the US with the new engine. BMW plans to meet the standard by exporting more diesel cars and trucks to the U.S.
    
[[File:Gas1945-2008.jpg|thumb|550px]]
 
[[File:Gas1945-2008.jpg|thumb|550px]]
17,394

edits

Navigation menu