Difference between revisions of "Talk:Human evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
That is a good list. Okay. [[User:AddisonDM]] 29 December 2008 | That is a good list. Okay. [[User:AddisonDM]] 29 December 2008 | ||
| − | This page is useless and looks silly, at two sentences long. Do any real editors here want it?? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:46, 30 May 2009 (EDT) | + | This page is useless and looks silly, at two sentences long. Do any real (not Rod Weathers) editors here want it?? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:46, 30 May 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:46, May 30, 2009
I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? User:AddisonDM 28 December 2008
- "Thoroughly disproven" is perfectly accurate. See Counterexamples to Evolution for a very brief list. - Rod Weathers 20:17, 29 December 2008 (EST)
That is a good list. Okay. User:AddisonDM 29 December 2008
This page is useless and looks silly, at two sentences long. Do any real (not Rod Weathers) editors here want it?? AddisonDM 11:46, 30 May 2009 (EDT)