Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Panel"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MatteeNeutra (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I have SERIOUS issues with the "anonymous members" bit. Members in this position should HAVE to be marked as such. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:29, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | I have SERIOUS issues with the "anonymous members" bit. Members in this position should HAVE to be marked as such. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:29, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::OOO, OOO, can I be a member? I'll be ever so good! I promise I won't let my high school studies, lack of life experience or religious brain washing get in the way of making good fair decisions! Pwetty Please? [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:32, March 26, 2007
That hardly sounds like a panel of objective experts...Palmd001 16:22, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
- Is it supposed to be? --Huey gunna getcha 16:24, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
I have SERIOUS issues with the "anonymous members" bit. Members in this position should HAVE to be marked as such. --Sid 3050 16:29, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
- OOO, OOO, can I be a member? I'll be ever so good! I promise I won't let my high school studies, lack of life experience or religious brain washing get in the way of making good fair decisions! Pwetty Please? MatteeNeutra 16:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)