Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sam Brownback"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bob Arctor (talk | contribs) m (Formatting) |
MountainDew (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I vote to remove this as it is a link to an unreliable and obviously biased source. Actually I'm not even going to wait for a vote. This assertion isn't even cited in the article. Wikipedia also makes such an unsupported assertion. This is an obvious (though subtle) attempt to smear a wonderful principled conservative. -- [[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 16:24, 17 March 2007 (EDT) | I vote to remove this as it is a link to an unreliable and obviously biased source. Actually I'm not even going to wait for a vote. This assertion isn't even cited in the article. Wikipedia also makes such an unsupported assertion. This is an obvious (though subtle) attempt to smear a wonderful principled conservative. -- [[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 16:24, 17 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::All sources are biased, just some more so than others. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:32, March 26, 2007
HarryPalms
I suspect that HarryPalms [contribs] is a vandal. The name is an obvious reference to "hairy palms". Disgusting. Here's what he inserted into this article:
- He cites former Senator Jesse Helms as a model.[1]
I vote to remove this as it is a link to an unreliable and obviously biased source. Actually I'm not even going to wait for a vote. This assertion isn't even cited in the article. Wikipedia also makes such an unsupported assertion. This is an obvious (though subtle) attempt to smear a wonderful principled conservative. -- Bob Arctor 16:24, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
- All sources are biased, just some more so than others. MountainDew 17:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)