Difference between revisions of "Talk:Human evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This page is useless and looks silly, at two sentences long. Do any real (not Rod Weathers) editors here want it?? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:46, 30 May 2009 (EDT) | This page is useless and looks silly, at two sentences long. Do any real (not Rod Weathers) editors here want it?? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:46, 30 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::I'll take a stab at it. I have seen both sides of the aguments, and took an evolutionary biology course in college, but the evidence isn't there. So I will try and write this page from the evolutionary stand point, but fixing what needs to be fixed to keep in in line with [[The Bible|the truth.]] --[[User:BrandonB|BrandonB]] 14:17, 5 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:17, June 5, 2009
I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? User:AddisonDM 28 December 2008
- "Thoroughly disproven" is perfectly accurate. See Counterexamples to Evolution for a very brief list. - Rod Weathers 20:17, 29 December 2008 (EST)
That is a good list. Okay. User:AddisonDM 29 December 2008
This page is useless and looks silly, at two sentences long. Do any real (not Rod Weathers) editors here want it?? AddisonDM 11:46, 30 May 2009 (EDT)
- I'll take a stab at it. I have seen both sides of the aguments, and took an evolutionary biology course in college, but the evidence isn't there. So I will try and write this page from the evolutionary stand point, but fixing what needs to be fixed to keep in in line with the truth. --BrandonB 14:17, 5 June 2009 (EDT)