Difference between revisions of "Talk:Book of Joshua"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Let's work on this) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Not trying to stop you're creative input here, but this is no school bulletin board. Writing must be encyclopedic. (Not that I can always write that well, myself.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | Not trying to stop you're creative input here, but this is no school bulletin board. Writing must be encyclopedic. (Not that I can always write that well, myself.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The examples I gave were sourced to the book itself - the only unsourced claim was that some people tend to find the mass slaying of civilians a little distasteful. I can find some links for that as well if you like. [[User:MississippiMud|MisMud]] 20:47, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:47, March 27, 2007
Cut from article:
- It is considered one the more troubling books of the Bible due to its unambiguous exhortations to genocide - for example, after Joshua has massacred the entire population of Jericho (Joshua 6:20), God instructs him to 'Do to Ai what you did to Jericho' (Joshua 8:1).
I didn't say anyone "liked" genocide. I asked who called it "troubling". God killed lots of people with the flood; is that genocide?
Not trying to stop you're creative input here, but this is no school bulletin board. Writing must be encyclopedic. (Not that I can always write that well, myself.) --Ed Poor 20:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
The examples I gave were sourced to the book itself - the only unsourced claim was that some people tend to find the mass slaying of civilians a little distasteful. I can find some links for that as well if you like. MisMud 20:47, 26 March 2007 (EDT)