Difference between revisions of "Talk:Plastic"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(grosslt oversimplified article - also technically wrong)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
This article is simply wrong. Plastics such as nitrocellulose were discovered in the 1800's; not all plastics are derived from oil, etc.  This article should be rewritten and expanded. [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 23:37, 8 June 2009 (EDT)
+
== This article is simply wrong ==
 +
 
 +
Plastics such as nitrocellulose were discovered in the 1800's; not all plastics are derived from oil, etc.  This article should be rewritten and expanded. [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 23:37, 8 June 2009 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
*Well, feel free to revise it, add what is needed, Paul.  You're an editor here. Just include the references, please! Thanks. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:07, 15 June 2009 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 04:07, June 15, 2009

This article is simply wrong

Plastics such as nitrocellulose were discovered in the 1800's; not all plastics are derived from oil, etc. This article should be rewritten and expanded. PaulBurnett 23:37, 8 June 2009 (EDT)

  • Well, feel free to revise it, add what is needed, Paul. You're an editor here. Just include the references, please! Thanks. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 00:07, 15 June 2009 (EDT)