Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
420 bytes added ,  00:00, June 19, 2009
cleared out liberal bias re: evolution examples
Line 76: Line 76:     
As an example, [[Gregor Mendel]] established the genetic theory that remains current today, even though Mendel's experimental technique was badly flawed, and he even stands accused of falsifying key data. But succeeding [[science|scientists]], using accepted methods of verification and statistical assessment, have achieved results consistent with this theory. Thus the theory remains valid even though Mendel's original presentation was fraudulent. Any attempt today to discredit Mendel's theory on account of Mendel's sloppy methods would be an example of a genetic fallacy.<ref name=Genetic>[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/genefall.html Genetic Fallacy] on [http://www.fallacyfiles.org/ The Fallacy Files]</ref>
 
As an example, [[Gregor Mendel]] established the genetic theory that remains current today, even though Mendel's experimental technique was badly flawed, and he even stands accused of falsifying key data. But succeeding [[science|scientists]], using accepted methods of verification and statistical assessment, have achieved results consistent with this theory. Thus the theory remains valid even though Mendel's original presentation was fraudulent. Any attempt today to discredit Mendel's theory on account of Mendel's sloppy methods would be an example of a genetic fallacy.<ref name=Genetic>[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/genefall.html Genetic Fallacy] on [http://www.fallacyfiles.org/ The Fallacy Files]</ref>
 +
 +
The genetic fallacy does not apply to arguments against a theory that caused a true believer to commit atrocities in reliance on the theory:
 +
 +
* Hitler and his top aides believed in the theory of evolution
 +
* Hitler and his top aids justified heinous crimes by applying the theory of evolution
 +
* Therefore, the theory of evolution is likely wrong
    
===Proof by numbers===
 
===Proof by numbers===
Line 279: Line 285:  
For example: "The coach said we should eat light, so take your heavy coat off."
 
For example: "The coach said we should eat light, so take your heavy coat off."
   −
===Moving the Goalpost===
+
===Moving the Goalposts===
−
Moving the goalpost is used when one is unable to prove what they set out to prove, so they change their goals to make it seem like they were proving something else.
+
[[Moving the goalposts]] is jargon used almost exclusively by evolutionists to decline to answer a question that is the logical next step in their argument.  This next step is avoided by evolutionists by claiming that their critics are "moving the goalposts."
   −
For example: Claiming that 'Theory' of Evolution does not seek to explain the origin of life is moving the goalpost. Darwinists can't explain how life was created, so they move the goalpost.
+
For example, Darwinists claim that asking how the theory of evolution explains the origin of life is "moving the goalposts," even though it is a logical question to ask.
    
== Related References ==
 
== Related References ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu