Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
490 bytes added ,  01:53, June 21, 2009
who pays for DNA testing for criminals? Taxpayers, and even the victims' fund
Line 6: Line 6:     
Some prisoners released on the basis on DNA evidence proceed to commit new crimes.  For example, the work of the Wisconsin Innocence Project resulted in the release of Steven Avery, who had been convicted for sexually assaulting and almost killing a young woman based upon eyewitness testimony.<ref>http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/steven_avery_halbach/2.html</ref>  Not only did the Wisconsin Innocence Project obtain his release, but it also obtained an order that Wisconsin pay him nearly $428,000 as compensation for his supposedly being wrongfully convicted. Shortly after his release based on DNA evidence, Mr. Avery brutally [[murder]]ed a 25-year-old woman photographer who was working for an auto magazine.<ref>http://badgerherald.com/oped/2005/11/16/dna_critical_in_deat.php</ref>  Avery claimed he had not been inside her bloodied car, but DNA evidence proved he had.
 
Some prisoners released on the basis on DNA evidence proceed to commit new crimes.  For example, the work of the Wisconsin Innocence Project resulted in the release of Steven Avery, who had been convicted for sexually assaulting and almost killing a young woman based upon eyewitness testimony.<ref>http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/steven_avery_halbach/2.html</ref>  Not only did the Wisconsin Innocence Project obtain his release, but it also obtained an order that Wisconsin pay him nearly $428,000 as compensation for his supposedly being wrongfully convicted. Shortly after his release based on DNA evidence, Mr. Avery brutally [[murder]]ed a 25-year-old woman photographer who was working for an auto magazine.<ref>http://badgerherald.com/oped/2005/11/16/dna_critical_in_deat.php</ref>  Avery claimed he had not been inside her bloodied car, but DNA evidence proved he had.
 +
 +
== Who Pays for DNA Testing? ==
 +
 +
The vast majority of criminals have defenses provided at taxpayer expense.  Who pays for the expensive DNA testing that their attorneys demand?
 +
 +
In Ohio, it used $571,000 that had been set aside as part of a victims fund in order to comply with requests by convicted felons for DNA testing.  <ref>http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/08/08/loc_loc1ohdna.html</ref>The convicted felons had nothing to lose by making the requests, and it cost them nothing.
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:law]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,215

edits

Navigation menu