Changes

597 bytes added ,  04:59, March 27, 2007
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Crimeney, you've got it all wrong again...I'll try to clean up the science part without disturbing your point, if you dont mind.[[User:Palmd001|PalMD]] 00:36, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Crimeney, you've got it all wrong again...I'll try to clean up the science part without disturbing your point, if you dont mind.[[User:Palmd001|PalMD]] 00:36, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Ok, Dawkin's letter shows NO approval for eugenics, just the opposite.  Careful with the quote mining.  Im not saying that no one in the world is a eugenecist, but chose the right ones. 
 +
Singer is interesting...he makes ethical arguments about the sanctity of life, and creats a spectrum of sanctity.  His ideas can be offensive, but he clearly states that killing is bad, just some killing is bad in different ways.  He does not, as far as I can tell, speak of eugenics at all.  You might consider leaving him out and finding a better example.[[User:Palmd001|PalMD]] 00:59, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
1,660

edits