12
edits
Changes
mLine 72:
Line 72: + +
→Let's do this.
:::::: What sets Conservapedia apart, and in many ways above, the sources you cite is that Conservapedia is an ''educational'' resource free of [[liberal bias]]. That applies to the math entries just like any other.
:::::: What sets Conservapedia apart, and in many ways above, the sources you cite is that Conservapedia is an ''educational'' resource free of [[liberal bias]]. That applies to the math entries just like any other.
::::::: I don't know what you mean by "liberal bias" in regards to mathematics in the sources I cited, and the Wikipedia, Scholarpedia and Wolfram site are certainly educational in nature. That said, it appears that a good start has been made on remodeling the mathematics section. Has anyone considered inviting Robert Herrmann to write an article on nonstandard analysis? He is a believer with an extremely interesting story, many published articles on mathematics and Christianity (and both!) and impeccable credentials. [[User:jdstarrett|jdstarrett]] 16:49, 1 July 2009 (MST)
:::::: A wiki is not for standing around talking. It's for substantive edits, and the sooner one starts, the better.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:40, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
:::::: A wiki is not for standing around talking. It's for substantive edits, and the sooner one starts, the better.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:40, 1 July 2009 (EDT)