Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gravina Island Bridge"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
My edit just now wasn't meant as an accusation, I rather thought that the "Palin proudly claimed" sentence seemed to accuse her of hypocrisy. - RogerS | My edit just now wasn't meant as an accusation, I rather thought that the "Palin proudly claimed" sentence seemed to accuse her of hypocrisy. - RogerS | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Palin is a refreshing change to politics-as-usual. You must learn to give her a chance.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:10, 13 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:10, July 13, 2009
This article needs an overhaul. How does it fit Cat:Corruption? Stevens was not convicted of anything relating to this project. Further, Stevens conviction was thrown out. Again, how does Palin's stance in this matter relate to "corruption." Frankly, the whole article smacks of a hit piece. It may need deletion if its not seriously overhauled. Thank you. Rob Smith 14:21, 13 July 2009 (EDT)
My edit just now wasn't meant as an accusation, I rather thought that the "Palin proudly claimed" sentence seemed to accuse her of hypocrisy. - RogerS
- Palin is a refreshing change to politics-as-usual. You must learn to give her a chance.--Jpatt 15:10, 13 July 2009 (EDT)