Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ilikebigbibles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(aimless, sloppy contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:[[User:JC|JC]] 09:35, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | :[[User:JC|JC]] 09:35, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::lol! good reference site btw, cheers. [[User:Ilikebigbibles|Ilikebigbibles]] 09:40, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | ::lol! good reference site btw, cheers. [[User:Ilikebigbibles|Ilikebigbibles]] 09:40, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Your contributions seem sloppy and aimless. I'm thinking of reverting them all. Please explain what you are doing here. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:03, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:03, March 27, 2007
Excuse me, but that statement you removed was not offensive. It was made at a time when the article was a load of nonsense. Look at the history. --Horace 01:53, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Ah, right. my apologies, i thought you were just making trouble. Have a nice day. Ilikebigbibles 01:56, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Please do not vandalize articles by changing factual information (like New Jersey to New Hampshire). MountainDew 02:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Please do not accuse me of vandalism unnecessarily. That was not factual information, it was just an example of a state. And i decided to replace New Jersey with New Hampshire, because it is a more conservative, and therefore better state. If you feel that the article would be more beneficial with NJ, feel free to change it back. Ilikebigbibles 02:32, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Ah, I thought that was an actual legal brief. Okay. MountainDew 02:35, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- I like the KJV [1] too, though I suspect mine isn't as big as yours.
- JC 09:35, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
- lol! good reference site btw, cheers. Ilikebigbibles 09:40, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Your contributions seem sloppy and aimless. I'm thinking of reverting them all. Please explain what you are doing here. --Ed Poor 10:03, 27 March 2007 (EDT)