| Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | ::<math>H : [0,1] \times [0,1] \to X</math> | | ::<math>H : [0,1] \times [0,1] \to X</math> |
| | which satisfies | | which satisfies |
| − | ::<math>H(t,0)=\gamma_0(t)\,</math>, <math>H(t,0)=\gamma_2(t)\,</math>, <math>H(0,s)=H(1,s)=*\,</math> | + | ::<math>H(t,0)=\gamma_0(t)\,</math>, <math>H(t,1)=\gamma_1(t)\,</math>, <math>H(0,s)=H(1,s)=*\,</math> |
| | The intuition is this: for every value of <math>s \in [0,1]</math>, we get a path <math>\gamma_s(t) : [0,1] \to X</math>, and at <math>s=0</math> and <math>s=1</math>, these are the two paths in question. Thus <math>H</math> provides a smoothly-varying set of paths in <math>X</math>, parametrized by a variable <math>s</math>, starting with <math>\gamma_0</math>, and ending with <math>\gamma_1</math>. This relation is often written as <math>\gamma_0 \sim \gamma_1</math>. | | The intuition is this: for every value of <math>s \in [0,1]</math>, we get a path <math>\gamma_s(t) : [0,1] \to X</math>, and at <math>s=0</math> and <math>s=1</math>, these are the two paths in question. Thus <math>H</math> provides a smoothly-varying set of paths in <math>X</math>, parametrized by a variable <math>s</math>, starting with <math>\gamma_0</math>, and ending with <math>\gamma_1</math>. This relation is often written as <math>\gamma_0 \sim \gamma_1</math>. |
| | | | |
| − | The constant path is defined by <math>\gamma_c(t) = *</math>, for all <math>t</math>. A space is said to be simply-connected if every loop based at <math>*</math> is homotopic to the constant path. This definition serves to make the intuition in terms of shrinking rubber bands precise. | + | The constant path is defined by <math>\gamma_c(t) = *\,</math>, for all <math>t</math>. A space is said to be simply-connected if every loop based at <math>*</math> is homotopic to the constant path. This definition serves to make the intuition in terms of shrinking rubber bands precise. |
| | | | |
| | '''Problem:''' Prove that the relation of homotopy of paths is an [[equivalence relation]] on the set of paths. | | '''Problem:''' Prove that the relation of homotopy of paths is an [[equivalence relation]] on the set of paths. |