Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scientific method"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: An example of an excellent, useful article. Will it be deleted for failing one of ASchlafly's tests? I ask not to be a pain, but because accepting this entry should cause the rejection o...) |
(needs improvement) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An example of an excellent, useful article. Will it be deleted for failing one of ASchlafly's tests? I ask not to be a pain, but because accepting this entry should cause the rejection of a large percentage of articles currently here. | An example of an excellent, useful article. Will it be deleted for failing one of ASchlafly's tests? I ask not to be a pain, but because accepting this entry should cause the rejection of a large percentage of articles currently here. | ||
[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 22:41, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 22:41, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It won't be deleted, if I have any say in the matter. But item #3 is incomplete and has a poor example. | ||
Revision as of 18:28, March 27, 2007
An example of an excellent, useful article. Will it be deleted for failing one of ASchlafly's tests? I ask not to be a pain, but because accepting this entry should cause the rejection of a large percentage of articles currently here. Palmd001 22:41, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- It won't be deleted, if I have any say in the matter. But item #3 is incomplete and has a poor example.