Difference between revisions of "Talk:Theory of relativity/draft"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
I'll take a crack at it now. I have a basic understanding of special relativity. Its a very tough cookie to crack though and without delving into huge scientific proofs its hard to explain properly! I shall give it my best though. [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I'll take a crack at it now. I have a basic understanding of special relativity. Its a very tough cookie to crack though and without delving into huge scientific proofs its hard to explain properly! I shall give it my best though. [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I believe Andrew would want us to state that the Theory of Relativity is a materalistic theory like the theory of evolution.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 16:42, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:42, March 27, 2007

In case anyone is wondering why this page exists, I'm writing a new version of this article, in an attempt to make it more scientifically sound. Geekman314(contact me) 11:40, 10 March 2007 (EST)

Is anyone going to add anything of substance? It only has 4 sentences, and it is misleading already. RSchlafly 16:30, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

I'll take a crack at it now. I have a basic understanding of special relativity. Its a very tough cookie to crack though and without delving into huge scientific proofs its hard to explain properly! I shall give it my best though. MatteeNeutra 16:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

I believe Andrew would want us to state that the Theory of Relativity is a materalistic theory like the theory of evolution.--TimS 16:42, 27 March 2007 (EDT)