Difference between revisions of "Passive smoking"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(conservative author disputes EPA "finding")
m (ref)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Passive [[smoking]]''', or second-hand smoking, is the inhaling of [[tobacco]] fumes exhaled by other smokers. It has been shown to cause lung cancer{{fact}} and is the reason for the smoking ban in many public areas.
 
'''Passive [[smoking]]''', or second-hand smoking, is the inhaling of [[tobacco]] fumes exhaled by other smokers. It has been shown to cause lung cancer{{fact}} and is the reason for the smoking ban in many public areas.
  
The [[EPA]] calls environmental tobacco smoke  a [[Group A carcinogen]], asserting that it is "responsible for approximately 3,000 lung cancer deaths annually in U.S. nonsmokers." [http://www.epa.gov/smokefree/pubs/etsfs.html#Major%20Conclusions] But a federal judge "ruled that the agency's report ignored accepted scientific and statistical practices in making its risk assessment."<ref> [http://fumento.com/smoke.html Michael Fumento investigates: "EPA's Pseudoscience Goes Up in Smoke."]</ref>
+
The [[EPA]] calls environmental tobacco smoke  a [[Group A carcinogen]], asserting that it is "responsible for approximately 3,000 lung cancer deaths annually in U.S. nonsmokers."<ref> [http://www.epa.gov/smokefree/pubs/etsfs.html#Major%20Conclusions "Fact Sheet: Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking"]</ref> But a federal judge "ruled that the agency's report ignored accepted scientific and statistical practices in making its risk assessment."<ref> [http://fumento.com/smoke.html Michael Fumento investigates: "EPA's Pseudoscience Goes Up in Smoke."]</ref>
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==

Revision as of 03:45, August 17, 2009

Passive smoking, or second-hand smoking, is the inhaling of tobacco fumes exhaled by other smokers. It has been shown to cause lung cancer[Citation Needed] and is the reason for the smoking ban in many public areas.

The EPA calls environmental tobacco smoke a Group A carcinogen, asserting that it is "responsible for approximately 3,000 lung cancer deaths annually in U.S. nonsmokers."[1] But a federal judge "ruled that the agency's report ignored accepted scientific and statistical practices in making its risk assessment."[2]

Notes