Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unemployment"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: The article should make some mention of a fourth kind - seasonal unemployment. I'll make some edits as soon as I have a chance. --~~~~)
 
(An article doesn't get this bad by accidend - I need help here)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The article should make some mention of a fourth kind - seasonal unemployment. I'll make some edits as soon as I have a chance. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 19:26, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 
The article should make some mention of a fourth kind - seasonal unemployment. I'll make some edits as soon as I have a chance. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 19:26, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Bad writing==
 +
 +
Is the bad writing in this article deliberate? No one but socialists or liberals ever asserted that "can't find a job that pays what I want" is a measure of unemployment. If it did, then people on strike would be "unemployed". There are are other sloppy parts that look like deliberate insertions of biased or stupid stuff. Please help me fix this article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:18, 27 August 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:18, August 27, 2009

The article should make some mention of a fourth kind - seasonal unemployment. I'll make some edits as soon as I have a chance. --Economist 19:26, 9 March 2009 (EDT)

Bad writing

Is the bad writing in this article deliberate? No one but socialists or liberals ever asserted that "can't find a job that pays what I want" is a measure of unemployment. If it did, then people on strike would be "unemployed". There are are other sloppy parts that look like deliberate insertions of biased or stupid stuff. Please help me fix this article. --Ed Poor Talk 16:18, 27 August 2009 (EDT)