Difference between revisions of "User talk:StephenE"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
:::No "problem" whatsoever! Thanks. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:28, 19 July 2009 (EDT)
 
:::No "problem" whatsoever! Thanks. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:28, 19 July 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Liberal Correction Comments==
 +
Can you stop with all the correction comments? If you insist on adding United States Founding fathers, I will have to block you and I have already mentioned it before. It is either American Founding Fathers or America's Founding Fathers or founding fathers of America. In the future, you would be best to read [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]. You are guilty of #15 and #20.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:00, 31 August 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:00, August 31, 2009

Welcome!

Hello, StephenE, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, StephenE!


ṬK/Admin/Talk 14:35, 15 July 2009 (EDT)


thanks. StephenE 14:37, 15 July 2009 (EDT)

Good pick on the troll CameronJ. He was shown the door. Karajou 15:16, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
Just hit me what a really immature thing that was to do. I owe you an apology. Thanks, and thanks for restoring my faith in the common sense of people. JCameron 15:21, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
Even if I just became a member here, I'm keenly interested in the divides between liberals and conservatives and between people of faith and those without faith that are so important to the way our country works, and over the past few months I've followed Conservapedia as part of my interest in those topics. I understand the idea that people--for better or worse, for right or wrong--are opposed to the ideology that underlies this project, and for the most part I can (sometimes begrudgingly) respect that opposition because I value freedom of thought and speech. But to deliberately spread lies and falsehoodsin order to make your ideological opponents look bad hurts everyone. If there is truth behind your ideals, those ideals will triumph on their own merits. StephenE 15:29, 15 July 2009 (EDT)

astronaut?

Do you not consider "Astronaut" to be a title? --ṬK/Admin/Talk 21:27, 17 July 2009 (EDT)

Not really, sir--as I recall, most astronauts have a officer's military rank, which of course, would be capitalized, but I don't believe I've ever seen "astronaut" capitalized like, say, "Colonel" would be. Of course, I'm willing to concede the point to more experienced editors. StephenE 14:36, 19 July 2009 (EDT)
Titles, being proper Nouns, should be in upper case. Astronauts, plural usage, non specific would not be capitalized, however as part of a title, referring to a specific person, would be upper case. I checked with another Admin on this, and he agreed as well. So, it is yet another mixed use Noun....which is the case on the NASA and other websites, when I looked. So, let's just capitalize it when referencing a specific, okay? Thanks! --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:35, 19 July 2009 (EDT)
Not a problem, sir. Sorry for creating any problems.StephenE 15:39, 19 July 2009 (EDT)
No "problem" whatsoever! Thanks. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 19:28, 19 July 2009 (EDT)

Liberal Correction Comments

Can you stop with all the correction comments? If you insist on adding United States Founding fathers, I will have to block you and I have already mentioned it before. It is either American Founding Fathers or America's Founding Fathers or founding fathers of America. In the future, you would be best to read Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia. You are guilty of #15 and #20.--Jpatt 14:00, 31 August 2009 (EDT)