Changes

458 bytes added ,  05:20, March 28, 2007
explanation of repeated rollback of AmesG's edit, and locking page
Line 1: Line 1:  
Andy, I'm right.  The "Living Constitution" idea is the "responsive" modality of interpretation, typified by Brown.  How is that wrong?  Unless you disagree with Brown.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:19, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Andy, I'm right.  The "Living Constitution" idea is the "responsive" modality of interpretation, typified by Brown.  How is that wrong?  Unless you disagree with Brown.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:19, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
AmesG repeatedly inserted a reference to Brown v. Board of Ed. in an attempt to justify the liberal "evolving Constitution."
 +
 +
Brown v. Board of Ed. overturned the Supreme Court's own ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson.  The citation is simply inappropriate here.
 +
 +
This page has to be locked to prevent recurrence of this edit, and vandalism, because this page is now linked on the main page for the 28th.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:20, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,552

edits