19
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 68:
Line 68: + + + +
→A British Wikipedian says
::Careful, Andy! Your bias is showing! But then again, you have a point. Racial profiling, torture, wiretapping, et al, are all pretty tolerant.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:25, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
::Careful, Andy! Your bias is showing! But then again, you have a point. Racial profiling, torture, wiretapping, et al, are all pretty tolerant.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:25, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Please enlighten me by defining liberal "as it really is". Further more, you still didn't answer point 2. You mentioned that Wikipedia is more liberal which, although true, is never disputed on this page. Perhaps you misunderstood? And finally, then you say "which rule is this?", I mean this rule on the page "Wikipedia: Citing sources":
"Wikipedia articles and categories cannot be used as sources."