Difference between revisions of "Talk:Confucius"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MatteeNeutra (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I'm sorry, but is it untrue that he was a pagan? It were his teachings not compatible with many parts of Christ's teachings?[[User:Saved|Saved]] 11:14, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | I'm sorry, but is it untrue that he was a pagan? It were his teachings not compatible with many parts of Christ's teachings?[[User:Saved|Saved]] 11:14, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Confuscious was not a pagan, no. I also imagine that if '''Confucius''' was alive today he'd probably be '''Confucian'''! [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 11:23, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:23, March 28, 2007
The Chinese Philosophers as a whole need to be expanded upon and elaborated. Too much of the information in these pages is outdated (using incorrect transcription models) or incorrect. Dikaiosune 10:37 pm March 18, 2007
Reverted page to pinyin spellings until the Wade-Giles/Pinyin debate has concluded. Please refer to the Romanization page. -- Dikaiosune 11:15pm 20 March 2007
I'm sorry, but is it untrue that he was a pagan? It were his teachings not compatible with many parts of Christ's teachings?Saved 11:14, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- Confuscious was not a pagan, no. I also imagine that if Confucius was alive today he'd probably be Confucian! MatteeNeutra 11:23, 28 March 2007 (EDT)