Difference between revisions of "Talk:France"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.
 
Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.
 +
 +
March 2003-I didn't realize that they found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. What is your source for this statement?

Revision as of 15:32, March 28, 2007

Unless you go into a full discussion of France's politics, which could very well happen in the future, I suppose, the statement about France not supporting the invasion of Iraq seems to be a bit irrelevant. Are we going to list every single country's stance on the Iraq war? -Commodore Guff 14:52, 8 March 2007 (EST)

It is very important to know who is "with us" and who is "against us".</sarcasm> (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --Sid 3050 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
Seriously if you want an unbiased article then one country's (i.e; Americas) opinion on another really does have no place in it... --Daerean 12:24, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

Spelling

I made a bunch of fixes to the non-American spellings in this article. Let's keep those double-L's (rivalled) and silent U's (behaviour) out of Conservapedia as per the Commandments.

War on Terror

Why do we find under Germany :

War on Terror

Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq.

And why it is not showing the same information under France? See: http://www.nato.int/ISAF/index.htm

Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.

March 2003-I didn't realize that they found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. What is your source for this statement?