Difference between revisions of "Talk:National Review"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Yes== I believe that you were correct to italicize this, Ed. ~~~~)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I believe that you were correct to italicize this, Ed. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 13:30, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I believe that you were correct to italicize this, Ed. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 13:30, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Thanks. I'd like to see the establishment of a Manual of Style which tells us when to use '''bold''' and ''italics''. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:*Magazine titles: ''The National Review'', ''The New Yorker'', ''Scientific American''

Revision as of 19:53, March 28, 2007

Yes

I believe that you were correct to italicize this, Ed. MountainDew 13:30, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks. I'd like to see the establishment of a Manual of Style which tells us when to use bold and italics. --Ed Poor 15:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Magazine titles: The National Review, The New Yorker, Scientific American