Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Articles for deletion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Work with me?) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I'm also thinking of grouping all open AFD requests on a single page, using [[transclusion]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:51, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | :I'm also thinking of grouping all open AFD requests on a single page, using [[transclusion]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:51, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::I think that's a great idea! The current AFDs (with the exception of [[AFD Evolutionism]] maybe - Is that one still open? There was a draft version, and somebody removed the template, but the article's Talk page basically went on about it... I lost track, I think) are quite short, so the resulting all-in-one page should be a nice move. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 15:56, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ::I think that's a great idea! The current AFDs (with the exception of [[AFD Evolutionism]] maybe - Is that one still open? There was a draft version, and somebody removed the template, but the article's Talk page basically went on about it... I lost track, I think) are quite short, so the resulting all-in-one page should be a nice move. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 15:56, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'll start doing it, if you'll help. I'd like to have two pages - or one page with two sections. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Anyway, the parts would list: | ||
| + | :#pages marked for deletion - and they still exist | ||
| + | :#pages marked for deletion - but they were deleted | ||
| + | |||
| + | :We might even be able to "close" discussions with a "no consensus" or "senior staff decided" or whatever. (Note that I am not senior staff; I just got here! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:00, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:00, March 28, 2007
I think {{Delete Notice}} already sorts tagged articles into Category:Articles proposed for deletion. Might be a good start, but I have no idea if that template is still in active use or if this page is better. Just throwing info bits out there. We have very little organization with AFDs right now. :/ --Sid 3050 15:48, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- Oh, thanks, I didn't know about that.
- I'm also thinking of grouping all open AFD requests on a single page, using transclusion. --Ed Poor 15:51, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- I think that's a great idea! The current AFDs (with the exception of AFD Evolutionism maybe - Is that one still open? There was a draft version, and somebody removed the template, but the article's Talk page basically went on about it... I lost track, I think) are quite short, so the resulting all-in-one page should be a nice move. --Sid 3050 15:56, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- I'll start doing it, if you'll help. I'd like to have two pages - or one page with two sections.
- Anyway, the parts would list:
- pages marked for deletion - and they still exist
- pages marked for deletion - but they were deleted
- We might even be able to "close" discussions with a "no consensus" or "senior staff decided" or whatever. (Note that I am not senior staff; I just got here! ;-) --Ed Poor 16:00, 28 March 2007 (EDT)