Difference between revisions of "Slippery slope"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(as requested . . .) |
(generally recognized as a logical fallacy) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*If we don't stop the terrorists in Iraq, they'll invade Maine next! | *If we don't stop the terrorists in Iraq, they'll invade Maine next! | ||
*If we send in 100,000 troops, the next thing you know we'll be in a quagmire like Vietnam! | *If we send in 100,000 troops, the next thing you know we'll be in a quagmire like Vietnam! | ||
| + | |||
| + | This sort of argument is generally recognized as a [[logical fallacy]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | *[[Non Causa Pro Causa]] | ||
Revision as of 21:52, March 28, 2007
The metaphor of a "slippery slope" conjures up images of the danger of coming too close to the edge of a cliff. One step in itself may not cause you any harm, as it merely brings you down the slope a bit. But if you take enough steps toward the brink, you will reach a point where the slippery ground makes you lose your balance and tumble down over the precipice.
In rhetoric, a "slippery slope argument" is one which suggests that an innocent-seeming small action will lead inevitably to a disasterous result.
Examples:
- If we allow this increase in administrative fees, soon tuition will double!
- If we don't stop the terrorists in Iraq, they'll invade Maine next!
- If we send in 100,000 troops, the next thing you know we'll be in a quagmire like Vietnam!
This sort of argument is generally recognized as a logical fallacy.