Changes

Line 1,010: Line 1,010:     
::::::::::::::::: Magnetism is a relativistic effect. If you are using magnetism, you are using relativity. If you deny relativity, then what is magnetism? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:48, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
 
::::::::::::::::: Magnetism is a relativistic effect. If you are using magnetism, you are using relativity. If you deny relativity, then what is magnetism? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:48, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::::::::::::::: And what is morality?  Look, there's no denying that relativists insist on applying their assumptions to anything and everything.  Magnetism doesn't need relativity, and relativity hasn't produced a single thing that is productive.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:15, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
    
This discussion has degenerated in Andy arguing points that are not in the article. I suggest fixing these errors:
 
This discussion has degenerated in Andy arguing points that are not in the article. I suggest fixing these errors:
Line 1,022: Line 1,024:  
:Louis Essen, the man credited with determining the speed of light, wrote many fiery papers against it such as The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis.[5] - He is a kook.
 
:Louis Essen, the man credited with determining the speed of light, wrote many fiery papers against it such as The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis.[5] - He is a kook.
 
:Relativity also gravely conflicts with quantum mechanics, and although theories like string theory and quantum field theory have attempted to unify relativity and quantum mechanics, neither has been entirely successful or proven. - No, there is no known conflict. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:56, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
 
:Relativity also gravely conflicts with quantum mechanics, and although theories like string theory and quantum field theory have attempted to unify relativity and quantum mechanics, neither has been entirely successful or proven. - No, there is no known conflict. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:56, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: That's quite a rant, ranging from calling someone a "kook" to insisting that everyone accepts something.  See how your claims contradict each other?
 +
 +
:: The bottom line is this:  stop wasting taxpayer money on this stuff.  If you believe it so much, then donate your own money.  But the grand sum of money donated by relativists to something they claim is so great is this:  $0.  Enough said.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:15, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,533

edits