Changes

354 bytes added ,  22:01, March 28, 2007
Line 41: Line 41:     
::: It has nothing to do with whether I like him or I hate him. Either way, criticism of his views should be based on what he actually said. It does the reader no good to learn some straw man attacks. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:58, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::: It has nothing to do with whether I like him or I hate him. Either way, criticism of his views should be based on what he actually said. It does the reader no good to learn some straw man attacks. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:58, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
It does the reader no good, either, to learn intelligent design, but that's not stopped you yet!  Aside from that, what's a "straw man" argument?  Some sort of evolutionary scientist devil-work?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 18:01, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits