Difference between revisions of "Diagonalization"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Rewrite intro; make the mapping explicit, so we don't link into pages that aren't helping the cause.)
(Remove apparent parody dating to very first version. There is no "disproof of the existence of God" here.)
Line 51: Line 51:
 
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
 
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
  
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref> This seeming [[disproof]] of the existence of God has cast doubt on the validity of Cantor's diagonalization.
+
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 57: Line 57:
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
  
[[Category:Mathematics]][[Category:Philosophy]]
+
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 +
[[Category:Philosophy]]

Revision as of 02:50, October 22, 2009

<math>\frac{d}{dx} \sin x=?\,</math> This article/section deals with mathematical concepts appropriate for late high school or early college.

Diagonalization is a technique first used by Georg Cantor, a German mathematician. He used it to show that the real numbers can not be put into 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can also be applied in other contexts.

Proof of the non-countability of real numbers

First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line <math>\mathbb{R}\,</math> and the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. This function:

<math>y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}</math>

maps the entire real line to the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. Its inverse:

<math>x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,</math>

maps the open interval to the entire real line.

This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.

We will now use proof by contradiction to show that the open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are uncountable.

Assume the numbers in the open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers. Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:

<math> 0.a_{11}a_{12}a_{13}a_{14}a_{15}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{21}a_{22}a_{23}a_{24}a_{25}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{31}a_{32}a_{33}a_{34}a_{35}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{41}a_{42}a_{43}a_{44}a_{45}\dots </math>

<math> \vdots </math>

Where <math>a_{ij}\in\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}</math>

Construct the number,

<math>a=0.a_{1}a_{2}a_{3}a_{4}\dots</math>, where


<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.

Therefore <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.[1]

Diagonalization and the Existence of God

Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to Saint Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.[2]

However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.[3]

References

  1. A. N. Kolmogorov, Introductory Real Analysis. ISBN 978-0486612263.
  2. http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130
  3. Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds, Arkady Plotnitsky. In After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.