2,732
edits
Changes
→RSchlafly
::: No, that is not what I said at all. I did not say that the distinction is invalid, and I didn't say that scientists can't be trusted. Yes, I do see something wrong with your sentence -- it is directly contrary to what I said! If you care so much about what those scientists are saying, then why did you delete the section? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:20, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::: No, that is not what I said at all. I did not say that the distinction is invalid, and I didn't say that scientists can't be trusted. Yes, I do see something wrong with your sentence -- it is directly contrary to what I said! If you care so much about what those scientists are saying, then why did you delete the section? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:20, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::::Your treatment of it implied that it was only the "evolutionists" (a false term to begin with) support the view that scientific theories are stronger entities than theories in modern parlance, which is wrong.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 19:54, 28 March 2007 (EDT)