Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nicolaus Copernicus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(removed a perfectly good sentence) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Copernican Revolution == | == Copernican Revolution == | ||
AmesG, you removed a perfectly good sentence, and inserted a misleading one. Tycho's model had its advantages, but it didn't really solve the inconsistencies of the earlier models. Yes, later models were better, but that's obvious. What was wrong with the sentence before: "Many of the ancient Greek arguments for and against [[heliocentrism]] remained unresolved."? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:31, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | AmesG, you removed a perfectly good sentence, and inserted a misleading one. Tycho's model had its advantages, but it didn't really solve the inconsistencies of the earlier models. Yes, later models were better, but that's obvious. What was wrong with the sentence before: "Many of the ancient Greek arguments for and against [[heliocentrism]] remained unresolved."? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:31, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Get a cite and let's investigate it.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 19:55, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:55, March 28, 2007
Copernican Revolution
AmesG, you removed a perfectly good sentence, and inserted a misleading one. Tycho's model had its advantages, but it didn't really solve the inconsistencies of the earlier models. Yes, later models were better, but that's obvious. What was wrong with the sentence before: "Many of the ancient Greek arguments for and against heliocentrism remained unresolved."? RSchlafly 19:31, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- Get a cite and let's investigate it.-AmesGyo! 19:55, 28 March 2007 (EDT)