Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atom"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I couldn't find anyone contradicting basic quark theory) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Who are the quark skeptics? I never heard of any serious dispute about the theory of quarks. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:48, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | : Who are the quark skeptics? I never heard of any serious dispute about the theory of quarks. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:48, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | :: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-1753(198106)72%3A2%3C216%3ATHOTQ%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J | + | :: [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-1753(198106)72%3A2%3C216%3ATHOTQ%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J] [http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3687] |
| − | + | ||
| + | ::: I couldn't find anyone contradicting basic quark theory. A 1981 paper seemed to want to address some philosophical issues, I'm not sure. The 2003 story said that some observation was 10% different from what was expected, but no one is doubting quarks. Quark theory is rock solid science. (So is most of evolution, but that is for another page.) [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 23:58, 28 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:58, March 29, 2007
This entry clearly illustrates the inconsistency of the Conservapedia approach to science. The theory of evolution, which has an enormous range of experimental and observational support is reported skeptically. But the theory of quarks (QCD) is reported as simple fact though it has little experimental support. It would be easy to fill the page with quotes from quark skeptics at major universities as they do with evolution.
- Who are the quark skeptics? I never heard of any serious dispute about the theory of quarks. RSchlafly 13:48, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
- I couldn't find anyone contradicting basic quark theory. A 1981 paper seemed to want to address some philosophical issues, I'm not sure. The 2003 story said that some observation was 10% different from what was expected, but no one is doubting quarks. Quark theory is rock solid science. (So is most of evolution, but that is for another page.) RSchlafly 23:58, 28 March 2007 (EDT)