Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 93:
Line 93: + + + +
thanks
What's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMarkGall&diff=709407&oldid=708041 this about]? You think anyone can generate millions of web hits writing about imaginary numbers?! And you call me an "obvious parodist"? Get real. If you think that my edits explaining why there are no real solutions to the equation <math>x^2+1=0</math> are wrong, just correct them or say so. Or if you're really opposed to the [[Conservative Mathematics Project]], please just man up, say so, and explain why, rather than slinking around "keeping a low profile". [[User:SRFoster|SRFoster]] 19:41, 12 October 2009 (EDT)
What's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMarkGall&diff=709407&oldid=708041 this about]? You think anyone can generate millions of web hits writing about imaginary numbers?! And you call me an "obvious parodist"? Get real. If you think that my edits explaining why there are no real solutions to the equation <math>x^2+1=0</math> are wrong, just correct them or say so. Or if you're really opposed to the [[Conservative Mathematics Project]], please just man up, say so, and explain why, rather than slinking around "keeping a low profile". [[User:SRFoster|SRFoster]] 19:41, 12 October 2009 (EDT)
== Oops, thanks! ==
Oops in [[mathematics]], thanks for correcting my mistake!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:48, 6 November 2009 (EST)