nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 122:
Line 122: + +
→What do you think of this?
::This wasn't just an unitended consequence; this was active subversion to build a political coalition. And the poor sharecroppers oppressors cloaked themselves as their saviors. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:59, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::This wasn't just an unitended consequence; this was active subversion to build a political coalition. And the poor sharecroppers oppressors cloaked themselves as their saviors. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:59, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
*Well, I take it you actually believe that, however the actuality of it was they had no idea of the good political idea they had hit on. Later, of course, deeper Democratic Party thinkers (mainly in Congress) saw the advantage of the people suckling on the government teet forever. Most of those thinking there was some deep-seated conspiracy, on the part of the CPUSA or the Kremlin, were proven wrong by Nixon, among others. Most were merely idealists/idiots. Not to say there weren't some dedicated Communists and anarchists worming their way in too. Not to say Moscow didn't, belatedly see the need to mine information from their sympathizer's. Politically, it wasn't until FDR was, for the most part dead, did the Democratic strategists begin to realize that with a bit of manipulation, the underclass could be exploited into a consistency they could use. Those guys weren't Communists, just opportunists. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 00:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>