Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jurisprudence"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I know it's barely anything, but I have to go to work now, I'll try to put more stuff in tomorrow.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 15:48, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I know it's barely anything, but I have to go to work now, I'll try to put more stuff in tomorrow.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 15:48, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I don't think the following is a correct usage:
 +
 +
::"For example a criminal court might not have jurisprudence over a case but a civil court would".
 +
 +
:Don't you mean "jurisdiction" in that example?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 03:00, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 07:00, March 29, 2007

I know it's barely anything, but I have to go to work now, I'll try to put more stuff in tomorrow.--Elamdri 15:48, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

I don't think the following is a correct usage:
"For example a criminal court might not have jurisprudence over a case but a civil court would".
Don't you mean "jurisdiction" in that example? --Horace 03:00, 29 March 2007 (EDT)