Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jurisprudence"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Don't you mean "jurisdiction" in that example? --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 03:00, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | :Don't you mean "jurisdiction" in that example? --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 03:00, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I believe the exact phrase is "judicial jurisprudence" but I could be wrong. I'm very tired right now, I had 3 midterm exams today and they wiped me out.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:01, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:01, March 29, 2007
I know it's barely anything, but I have to go to work now, I'll try to put more stuff in tomorrow.--Elamdri 15:48, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
- I don't think the following is a correct usage:
- "For example a criminal court might not have jurisprudence over a case but a civil court would".
- Don't you mean "jurisdiction" in that example? --Horace 03:00, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- I believe the exact phrase is "judicial jurisprudence" but I could be wrong. I'm very tired right now, I had 3 midterm exams today and they wiped me out.--Elamdri 03:01, 29 March 2007 (EDT)