Difference between revisions of "Talk:Milky Way Galaxy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This article seems to be extremely biased towards the big-bang/naturalistic worldview, giving the impression that such things as the age of the milky way being billions of years old is a fact.  I would like to redress the balance here, and add not simply ignore the problems with these assumptions. [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 19:34, 24 November 2009 (EST)
 
This article seems to be extremely biased towards the big-bang/naturalistic worldview, giving the impression that such things as the age of the milky way being billions of years old is a fact.  I would like to redress the balance here, and add not simply ignore the problems with these assumptions. [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 19:34, 24 November 2009 (EST)
 
:Don't hold back!  Fix the article, by all means.  Earlier, I removed a passage about stars being millions of years old, but didn't see anything else blatant.  But if you see something that needs correcting, get on it! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:41, 24 November 2009 (EST)
 
:Don't hold back!  Fix the article, by all means.  Earlier, I removed a passage about stars being millions of years old, but didn't see anything else blatant.  But if you see something that needs correcting, get on it! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:41, 24 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:I used the available scientific information from various sources that I could find, what exactly do you disagree with?  Many of my cited sources are actual science papers.  If its "biased" it is so only to a scientific point of view based on the evidence at hand. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 21:01, 24 November 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 02:01, November 25, 2009

This article seems to be extremely biased towards the big-bang/naturalistic worldview, giving the impression that such things as the age of the milky way being billions of years old is a fact. I would like to redress the balance here, and add not simply ignore the problems with these assumptions. TrondE 19:34, 24 November 2009 (EST)

Don't hold back! Fix the article, by all means. Earlier, I removed a passage about stars being millions of years old, but didn't see anything else blatant. But if you see something that needs correcting, get on it! JacobB 19:41, 24 November 2009 (EST)
I used the available scientific information from various sources that I could find, what exactly do you disagree with? Many of my cited sources are actual science papers. If its "biased" it is so only to a scientific point of view based on the evidence at hand. --BMcP 21:01, 24 November 2009 (EST)