Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
265 bytes added ,  02:25, November 25, 2009
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
This article seems to be extremely biased towards the big-bang/naturalistic worldview, giving the impression that such things as the age of the milky way being billions of years old is a fact.  I would like to redress the balance here, and add not simply ignore the problems with these assumptions. [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 19:34, 24 November 2009 (EST)
 
This article seems to be extremely biased towards the big-bang/naturalistic worldview, giving the impression that such things as the age of the milky way being billions of years old is a fact.  I would like to redress the balance here, and add not simply ignore the problems with these assumptions. [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 19:34, 24 November 2009 (EST)
 
:Don't hold back!  Fix the article, by all means.  Earlier, I removed a passage about stars being millions of years old, but didn't see anything else blatant.  But if you see something that needs correcting, get on it! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:41, 24 November 2009 (EST)
 
:Don't hold back!  Fix the article, by all means.  Earlier, I removed a passage about stars being millions of years old, but didn't see anything else blatant.  But if you see something that needs correcting, get on it! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:41, 24 November 2009 (EST)
 
+
::I used the available scientific information from various sources that I could find, what exactly do you disagree with?  Many of my cited sources are actual science papers.  If its "biased" it is so only to a scientific point of view based on the evidence at hand. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 21:01, 24 November 2009 (EST)
:I used the available scientific information from various sources that I could find, what exactly do you disagree with?  Many of my cited sources are actual science papers.  If its "biased" it is so only to a scientific point of view based on the evidence at hand. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 21:01, 24 November 2009 (EST)
+
:::It's biased towards an Old Earth point of view, or it was before I removed the biased content.  The "big science" point of view is Old Earth as well, which is why the article is being considered for revision. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:25, 24 November 2009 (EST)
3,552

edits

Navigation menu