Changes

:Well unless you have some peer reviewed astrophysics or cosmology papers that shows the Big Bang is "likely false", you will forgive my not believing you. It is not relevant wither if they are creationists or not (although some creationists believe their God created the universe through a Big Bang), but wither their papers and research on coming up with that age passes scientific scrutiny and peer review. The best objection found was the website TrondE located, and while I don't see that is an actual scientific objection personally, for the sake of fairness I didn't impeded his placing in the article.  Everyone seemed satisfied until this need to try and paint the original scientific research as a bunch of assumptions, in essence maligning them.  I wonder now if it is better off if I toss that entire section. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 15:22, 29 November 2009 (EST)

:Well unless you have some peer reviewed astrophysics or cosmology papers that shows the Big Bang is "likely false", you will forgive my not believing you. It is not relevant wither if they are creationists or not (although some creationists believe their God created the universe through a Big Bang), but wither their papers and research on coming up with that age passes scientific scrutiny and peer review. The best objection found was the website TrondE located, and while I don't see that is an actual scientific objection personally, for the sake of fairness I didn't impeded his placing in the article.  Everyone seemed satisfied until this need to try and paint the original scientific research as a bunch of assumptions, in essence maligning them.  I wonder now if it is better off if I toss that entire section. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 15:22, 29 November 2009 (EST)