Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Epoch"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(this editorial dispute can take place on one page) |
(Thanks Ed) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Well, good. At least this editorial dispute can take place on one page. (I refuse to take sides or even express an opinion. I'm just your technical support guy at this point. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:50, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | Well, good. At least this editorial dispute can take place on one page. (I refuse to take sides or even express an opinion. I'm just your technical support guy at this point. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:50, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Thanks Ed!! Now, to clarify, there is no distinction between "evolutionary" and "mainstream" science, except that "evolutionary" is used as a pejorative here to denigrate the quality of the science, even though those using the term don't understand the science itself. Please understand and accept the distinction.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:20, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:20, March 29, 2007
Well, good. At least this editorial dispute can take place on one page. (I refuse to take sides or even express an opinion. I'm just your technical support guy at this point. :-) --Ed Poor 11:50, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- Thanks Ed!! Now, to clarify, there is no distinction between "evolutionary" and "mainstream" science, except that "evolutionary" is used as a pejorative here to denigrate the quality of the science, even though those using the term don't understand the science itself. Please understand and accept the distinction.-AmesGyo! 12:20, 29 March 2007 (EDT)