Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes added ,  23:11, December 5, 2009
m
→‎Media coverage: sentence fix
Line 59: Line 59:     
===Unreported===
 
===Unreported===
−
The liberal [[Wikipedia]] has cited various skeptical references to contend against factual arguments and has stated that the uncovered email files were illegally stolen by computer hackers, despite repeated requests for the data files under the [[FOIA]]. However, though unreported by the [[MSM]] and at the same time [[censorship|censored]] by liberal Wikipedia, there is strong evidence to suggest the data was released by a fellow employee, a "whistle blower" within the Climatic Research Unit.<ref>[http://www.junkscience.com Those <s>"hacked"</s> released CRU files], JunkScience.com, December 03, 2009.</ref>   
+
The liberal [[Wikipedia]] has cited various references to contend against the facts uncovered with the Climategate scandal and has claimed that the e-mail files were illegally stolen by computer hackers, despite repeated requests for the data files under the [[FOIA]]. Though unreported by the [[MSM]] and at the same time [[censorship|censored]] by liberal Wikipedia, there is strong evidence to suggest the data was released by a fellow employee, a "whistle blower" within the Climatic Research Unit.<ref>[http://www.junkscience.com Those <s>"hacked"</s> released CRU files], JunkScience.com, December 03, 2009.</ref>   
    
* There was no "security breach" at CRU that "stole" these files
 
* There was no "security breach" at CRU that "stole" these files
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,206

edits

Navigation menu