Changes

The first [[Liberal media|liberal media]] source to openly discuss Climategate on American television was during a segment on Comedy Central's ''[[The Daily Show]]'' with [[Jon Stewart]], a slapstick entertainment news program. After more than two weeks into the unfolding [[Climategate_scandal#Climategate_scandal|Climategate scandal]], [[CBS News|CBS evening news]] finally reported on [[Climategate]]. However, in-line with some search-engines odd display of confusion as to what the search query for "Climategate" is asking for, CBS evening news called the scandal "Climate Gate," a reference to the name [[Google]] suggested to searchers as a spin on the real name, "Climategate." CBS also provided the subtitle, "Leaked E-Mails Provide Climate Change Deniers Ammunition Near Beginning of Global Summit."<ref>Kimberly Dozier. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/12/05/eveningnews/main5908487.shtml "Climate Gate" Casts Cloud on Change Meet], ''[[CBS News]]'', December 5, 2009.</ref>

The first [[Liberal media|liberal media]] source to openly discuss Climategate on American television was during a segment on Comedy Central's ''[[The Daily Show]]'' with [[Jon Stewart]], a slapstick entertainment news program. After more than two weeks into the unfolding [[Climategate_scandal#Climategate_scandal|Climategate scandal]], [[CBS News|CBS evening news]] finally reported on [[Climategate]]. However, in-line with some search-engines odd display of confusion as to what the search query for "Climategate" is asking for, CBS evening news called the scandal "Climate Gate," a reference to the name [[Google]] suggested to searchers as a spin on the real name, "Climategate." CBS also provided the subtitle, "Leaked E-Mails Provide Climate Change Deniers Ammunition Near Beginning of Global Summit."<ref>Kimberly Dozier. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/12/05/eveningnews/main5908487.shtml "Climate Gate" Casts Cloud on Change Meet], ''[[CBS News]]'', December 5, 2009.</ref>

==Bias in Wikipedia==

==Liberal [[Bias in Wikipedia]]==

The liberal [[Wikipedia]] has cited various references attempting to contend against the facts uncovered from the Climategate scandal, and the [[Bias in Wikipedia|bias opinion from Wikipedia]] editors were quickly revealed as they claimed that the e-mail files were illegally stolen by computer hackers, despite repeated requests for the data files under the [[FOIA]] and regardless of the fact that, according to Wikipedia Talk Page editors, "Climategate is the clear public consensus."<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Climatic_Research_Unit_e-mail_hacking_incident&oldid=330163929#Climategate_is_the_clear_public_consensus_-_please_change_the_name. Talk:Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident], ''[[Wikipedia]]'', as edited by [[User:SEWilco]] at 01:50, 7 December 2009.</ref> Though unreported by the [[MSM]] and at the same time [[censorship|censored]] by liberal Wikipedia, there is strong evidence to suggest the data was released by a fellow employee, a "whistle blower" within the Climatic Research Unit.<ref>[http://www.junkscience.com Those <s>"hacked"</s> released CRU files], JunkScience.com, December 03, 2009.</ref>   

The liberal [[Wikipedia]] has cited various references attempting to contend against the facts uncovered from the Climategate scandal, and its liberal administrators were quick to enforce the websites [[double standard]] rule and claimed that the e-mail files were illegally stolen by computer hackers in the title of the article as well within it, despite repeated requests for the data files under the [[FOIA]] and regardless of the fact that, according to Wikipedia's article Talk Page discussing the name of the page, "Climategate is the clear public consensus."<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Climatic_Research_Unit_e-mail_hacking_incident&oldid=330163929#Climategate_is_the_clear_public_consensus_-_please_change_the_name. Talk:Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident], ''[[Wikipedia]]'', as edited by User:SEWilco at 01:50, 7 December 2009.</ref> Though unreported by the [[MSM]] and at the same time [[censorship|censored]] by liberal Wikipedia, there is strong evidence to suggest the data was released by a fellow employee, a "whistle blower" within the Climatic Research Unit.<ref>[http://www.junkscience.com Those <s>"hacked"</s> released CRU files], JunkScience.com, December 03, 2009.</ref>   

* There was no "security breach" at CRU that "stole" these files

* There was no "security breach" at CRU that "stole" these files