Difference between revisions of "Talk:Beta decay"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Boy, the scienc material is sure lightweight stuff in this 'encyclopedia'. Beyond the expected fruitloop creation theories, the other material is mostly devoid of context, definition, and ...) |
(True, so fix it.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Boy, the scienc material is sure lightweight stuff in this 'encyclopedia'. Beyond the expected fruitloop creation theories, the other material is mostly devoid of context, definition, and computational information. Go to Wikipedia if you want something worthwhile. | Boy, the scienc material is sure lightweight stuff in this 'encyclopedia'. Beyond the expected fruitloop creation theories, the other material is mostly devoid of context, definition, and computational information. Go to Wikipedia if you want something worthwhile. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It has barely begun, and most of the work was done by schoolchildren. A lot of time has been wasted by dealing with sabotage. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Please contribute a lot of scientific articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:21, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:21, March 29, 2007
Boy, the scienc material is sure lightweight stuff in this 'encyclopedia'. Beyond the expected fruitloop creation theories, the other material is mostly devoid of context, definition, and computational information. Go to Wikipedia if you want something worthwhile.
- It has barely begun, and most of the work was done by schoolchildren. A lot of time has been wasted by dealing with sabotage.
- Please contribute a lot of scientific articles. --Ed Poor 13:21, 29 March 2007 (EDT)